Gheaus, AncaMeijers, Tim2025-04-042025-04-042025-01-201356-47651572-869210.1007/s11158-024-09701-yhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14018/27012Axel Gosseries considers, and partly defends, several strategies to address the non-identity problem (NIP). We engage critically with two strategies endorsed by Gosseries: the severance strategy and the overlap strategy. The latter comprises two different sub-strategies: the containment sub-strategy and the indirect sub-strategy. We believe that severance is less promising than Gosseries suggests. It comes at a high theoretical cost, which is important to acknowledge even if, ultimately, there is reason to pay it. The sub-strategies that comprise the overlap strategy are more promising, and they can justify more in terms of the scope and content of inter-generational justice than Gosseries suggests in his book. Endorsing the overlap strategies is attractive because doing so limits the need for impersonal considerations in theories of inter-generational justice.engcc-byhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Arguments from overlapEqualityFuture generationsInter-generational justiceNon-identity problemhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=ceuapplication2024&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001400781200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPLhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217165318&partnerID=8YFLogxKGheaus, A & Meijers, T 2025, 'Injustice without Victims or Arguments from Generational Overlap? A Reply to Gosseries on Non-Identity', Res Publica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-024-09701-y