AbiGhanem, NassimHobaika, ZeinaMöller, Lena-MariaVölkel, Jan Claudius2023-08-292023-08-292022978-1-00-324004-410.4324/9781003240044-4http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14018/14115While most intersecting analysis on the spread of COVID-19 and politics so far has attempted to unpack the impact of the pandemic on national, regional and international politics, this chapter argues that there is a reverse influence where regional politics has also shaped the responses of some governments to the pandemic, ultimately affecting the status of their healthcare system. Lebanon serves as a case study. This chapter draws on the regional political settings that affected Lebanon’s policy for battling COVID-19. Although Lebanon was initially lauded for responding effectively to the first wave of the pandemic compared to other countries in the region, its punctured sovereignty through Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, caused more damage than publicly admitted. For instance, Hezbollah twisted the government’s arm into continuing flights to and from Iran despite Iran’s record number of infections. This allowed the virus to spread at a much higher rate. This chapter demonstrates how a regional hegemon burdened the host state of their proxies for the hegemon’s benefit.engCC BY-NC-ND 4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/The reverse impact of politics on the COVID-19 responseBook chapter