• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty Publications by Academic Department
    • Political Science
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty Publications by Academic Department
    • Political Science
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ORRCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType of PublicationThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType of Publication

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Wagemann_2009.pdf
    Size:
    161.0Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Schneider, Carsten Q.
    Wagemann, Claudius
    Publisher
    Brill
    Place of Publication
    Leiden
    Type
    Journal article
    Title / Series / Name
    Comparative Sociology
    Publication Volume
    9
    Date
    2010
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA- based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.
    identifiers
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Political Science

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.