Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Publisher
BrillPlace of Publication
LeidenType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
Comparative SociologyPublication Volume
9Date
2010
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA- based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
Scopus Count
Collections