Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiroska, Dóra
dc.contributor.authorSchlett, Bálint
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:43:28Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:43:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0969-2290, 1466-4526
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09692290.2023.2169739
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14018/13961
dc.description.abstractThe European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) was created in the early 1990s to promote the transition to a market economy and advance democracy in the post-communist countries of East Central Europe. How and why did this international organization, established for an entirely different purpose, then become an active investor in Egypt? Building on field theory, we explain the EBRD’s move to Egypt as an attempt to overcome the hysteresis effect of its anachronistic operational logic (habitus) within a changing field. Once in Egypt, the EBRD aspired to leverage its symbolic capital of technical assistance, democratic commitment and the privileging of the private sector. However, given Egypt’s increasingly autocratic and state capitalist evolution, it found delivering on its symbolic capital problematic. Its solution was to adapt to the very active European development finance field’s modalities. However, the European field’s logic ultimately de-prioritized democracy, human rights promotion, and poverty reduction and instead focused on sustainable investment, migration mitigation and containing Europe’s geo-economic rivals. In our case study, we demonstrate that the EBRD operated deftly within this field, while it also gained permission and even reward for its mandate management. It is a problematic finding for the future of the EU development policy.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMandate management: A field theory approach to the EBRD’s adaptive practice in Egypt
dc.typeJournal article
dc.source.journaltitleReview of International Political Economy
dc.source.spage1
dc.source.epage27
dc.description.versionPublished version
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-18T12:30:39Z
dc.contributor.unitDepartment of International Relations
dc.source.journalabbrevReview of International Political Economy
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09692290.2023.2169739


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Piroska-Dora_2023.pdf
Size:
2.090Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0