Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Gheaus, AncaPublisher
WileyType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
Philosophy CompassPublication Volume
16Publication Issue
12Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In philosophy, there are two competitor views about the nature and value of childhood: The first is the traditional, deficiency, view, according to which children are mere unfinished adults. The second is a view that has recently become increasingly popular amongst philosophers, and according to which children, perhaps in virtue of their biological features, have special and valuable capacities, and, more generally, privileged access to some sources of value. This article provides a conceptual map of these views and their possible interpretations, and notes their bearing on issues of population ethics and on the duties that we are owed during childhood.identifiers
10.1111/phc3.12793ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/phc3.12793
Scopus Count
Collections