Inner approximation algorithm for solving linear multiobjective optimization problems
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Csirmaz, LászlóPublisher
Taylor & FrancisType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
OptimizationPublication Volume
70Publication Issue
7Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Benson’s outer approximation algorithm and its variants are the most frequently used methods for solving linear multiobjective optimization problems. These algorithms have two intertwined parts: single-objective linear optimization on one hand, and a combinatorial part closely related to vertex enumeration on the other. Their separation provides a deeper insight into Benson’s algorithm, and points toward a dual approach. Two skeletal algorithms are defined which focus on the combinatorial part. Using different single-objective optimization problems – called oracle calls – yield different algorithms, such as a sequential convex hull algorithm, another version of Benson’s algorithm with the theoretically best possible iteration count, the dual algorithm of Ehrgott, L ̈ ohne and Shao [7], and the new algorithm. The new algorithm has several advantages. First, the corresponding single-objective optimization problem uses the original constraints without adding any extra variables or constraints. Second, its iteration count meets the theoretically best possible one. As a dual algorithm, it is sequential: in each iteration it produces an extremal solution, thus can be aborted when a satisfactory solution is found. The Pareto front can be “probed” or “scanned” from several directions at any moment without adversely affecting the efficiency. Finally, it is well suited to handle highly degenerate problems where there are many linear dependencies among the constraints. On problems with ten or more objectives the implementation shows a significant increase in efficiency compared to Bensolve – due to the reduced number of iterations and the improved combinatorial handling.identifiers
10.1080/02331934.2020.1737692ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/02331934.2020.1737692
Scopus Count
Collections