Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBogaards, Matthijs
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:43:08Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:43:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1351-0347, 1743-890X
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13510347.2018.1517255
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14018/13825
dc.description.abstractEmpirical research on democratization is dominated by case studies and small-N comparisons. This article is a first attempt to take stock of qualitative case-based research on democratization. It finds that most articles use methods implicitly rather than explicitly and are disconnected from the burgeoning literature on case-based methodology. This makes it difficult to summarize the substantive findings or to evaluate the contributions of the various approaches to our knowledge of democratic transition and consolidation. There is much to gain from a closer collaboration between methods experts and empirical researchers of democratization.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleCase-based research on democratization
dc.typeJournal article
dc.source.journaltitleDemocratization
dc.source.volume26
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.spage61
dc.source.epage77
dc.description.versionPublished version
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-16T14:43:08Z
dc.contributor.unitDepartment of Political Science
dc.source.journalabbrevDemocratization
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2018.1517255


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Bogaards-Matthijs_2019.pdf
Size:
1.136Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0