Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Publisher
Springer NaturePlace of Publication
AmsterdamType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
Review of Philosophy & PsychologyPublication Volume
11Publication Issue
11Date
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Art theory has consistently emphasised the importance of situational, cultural, institutional and historical factors in viewers’ experience of fine art. However, the link between this heavily context-dependent interpretation and the workings of the mind is often left unexamined. Drawing on relevance theory—a prominent, cogent and productive body of work in cognitive pragmatics—we here argue that fine art achieves its effects by prompting the use of cognitive processes that are more commonly employed in the interpretation of words and other stimuli presented in a communicative context. We describe in particular how institutional factors effectively co-opt these processes for new ends, allowing viewers to achieve cognitive effects that they otherwise would not, and so provide cognitivist backing for an Institutional Theory of Art, such as that put forward by Arthur Danto (1964). More generally, we situate and describe the Western fine art tradition as a phenomenon that is a consequence of both the cognitive processes involved in communication, and of cultural norms, practices and institutions.Publisher link
https://www.springer.com/journal/13164identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs13164-019-00443-yae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs13164-019-00443-y
Scopus Count
Collections