Unprotected Consumers in the Digital Age: The Consumer-creditors of Bankrupt, Abandoned, Defunct and of Zombie Companies
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Tajti, TiborPublisher
Tilburg UniversityPlace of Publication
TilburgType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
Tilburg Law ReviewPublication Volume
24Publication Issue
1Date
2019
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The aim of this article is to draw the attention of comparative scholars, researchers and policy-makers to the inferior position of consumer-creditors in bankruptcy proceedings, a topic that escaped attention during the development of financial protection of consumers in Europe. Consumers may become creditors if they prepay certain goods or services that remain undelivered following bankruptcy of a retailer or service-provider. The problem that results is that consumer-creditors are treated as unsecured creditors in bankruptcy law, who rank very low on the priority ladder and are doomed to recover only a small fraction of their claims, if anything at all. In order to fill the vacuum, the article attempts to map the real dimensions of the consumer-creditor problem first by outlining the spectrum of bankruptcy cases involving consumer-creditors and the threats to consumers inherent to abandoned and defunct companies that are usually left without assets creditors could collect upon. This includes case studies of major recent bankruptcies caused by appearance of new technologies (e.g., the collapse of UK Farepak due to appearance of Internet-based competitors) and linked abuses (web-fraudulent schemes). The second part of the article provides an overview of the regulatory responses, ranging from the prescriptive approach of US law implementing limited high priority to consumer-creditors in bankruptcy proceedings in the 1970s, the 2016 multi-pronged proposals of the UK Law Commission, to the specific regulatory responses of selected post-socialist systems, like the blocked accounts introduced by Croatia and Serbia, the forced deletions of Hungary and the special tax imposed in Slovakia.Publisher link
https://tilburglawreview.com/12/volume/24/issue/1/identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tilr.139ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tilr.139
Scopus Count
Collections