Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Bogaards, MatthijsPublisher
Taylor & FrancisType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
DemocratizationPublication Volume
26Publication Issue
1Date
2019
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Empirical research on democratization is dominated by case studies and small-N comparisons. This article is a first attempt to take stock of qualitative case-based research on democratization. It finds that most articles use methods implicitly rather than explicitly and are disconnected from the burgeoning literature on case-based methodology. This makes it difficult to summarize the substantive findings or to evaluate the contributions of the various approaches to our knowledge of democratic transition and consolidation. There is much to gain from a closer collaboration between methods experts and empirical researchers of democratization.Publisher link
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2018.1517255identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1517255ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1517255
Scopus Count
Collections