A Unifying Framework for Causal Analysis in Set-Theoretic Multimethod Research
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Type
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
Sociological Methods & ResearchPublication Volume
47Publication Issue
1Date
2018
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The combination of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) with process tracing, which we call set-theoretic multimethod research (MMR), is steadily becoming more popular in empirical research. Despite the fact that both methods have an elected affinity based on set theory, it is not obvious how a within-case method operating in a single case and a cross-case method operating on a population of cases are compatible and can be combined in empirical research. There is a need to reflect on whether and how set-theoretic MMR is internally coherent and how QCA and process tracing can be integrated in causal analysis. We develop a unifying foundation for causal analysis in set-theoretic MMR that highlights the roles and interplay of QCA and process tracing. We argue that causal inference via counterfactuals on the level of single cases integrates QCA and process tracing and assigns proper and equally valuable roles to both methods.Publisher link
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-019-00885-7identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626170ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626170
Scopus Count
Collections