A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju, & Csibra (2007)
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Publisher
Royal Society Open ScienceType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
Royal Society Open SciencePublication Volume
8Publication Issue
18Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The study by Southgate, V., Senju, A., and Csibra, G. (Southgate et al., 2007) has been widely cited as evidence for the ability of false-belief attribution in young children. Recent replication attempts of this paradigm have yielded mixed results: several studies were unable to replicate the original finding, raising doubts about the suitability of the paradigm to assess non-verbal action prediction and Theory of Mind. In a preregistered collaborative study including two of the original authors, we tested 160 24- to 26-month-olds across two locations following the original stimuli, procedure, and analyses as closely as possible. We found no evidence for action anticipation: only about half of the infants correctly anticipated the protagonist’s actions when action prediction did not require taking into account the agent’s beliefs. In addition, even those who appeared to anticipate failed to do so when a false belief was involved. These findings indicate that the paradigm of Southgate et al. (2007) cannot reliably elicit anticipatory action prediction and is unsuitable for testing false belief understanding in 2-year-olds.Publisher link
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.210190identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210190ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210190
Scopus Count
Collections