• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty Publications by Academic Department
    • Cognitive Science
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty Publications by Academic Department
    • Cognitive Science
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ORRCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType of PublicationThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType of Publication

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007)

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    schlingloffetal2020.pdf
    Size:
    268.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Schlingloff-Nemecz, Laura
    Csibra, Gergely
    Tatone, Denis
    Publisher
    Royal Society Open Science
    Type
    Journal article
    Title / Series / Name
    Royal Society Open Science
    Publication Volume
    7
    Date
    2020
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Hamlin et al. found in 2007 that preverbal infants displayed a preference for helpers over hinderers. The robustness of this finding and the conditions under which infant sociomoral evaluation can be elicited has since been debated. Here, we conducted a replication of the original study, in which we tested 14- to 16-month-olds using a familiarization procedure with 3D-animated video stimuli. Unlike previous replication attempts, ours uniquely benefitted from detailed procedural advice by Hamlin. In contrast to the original results, only 16 out of 32 infants (50%) in our study reached for the helper; thus, we were not able to replicate the findings. A possible reason for this failure is that infants’ preference for prosocial agents may not be reliably elicited with the procedure and stimuli adopted. Alternatively, the effect size of infants’ preference may be smaller than originally estimated. The study addresses ongoing methodological debates on the replicability of influential findings in infant cognition.
    Publisher link
    https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.191795
    identifiers
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191795
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191795
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Cognitive Science

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.