Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Ben-Yami, HanochPublisher
SpringerPlace of Publication
ChamType
Journal articleTitle / Series / Name
TopoiPublication Volume
34Publication Issue
1Date
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
I reconstruct from Rietdijk and Putnam's well-known papers an argument against the applicability of the concept of becoming in Special Relativity, which I think is unaffected by some of the objections found in the literature. I then consider a line of thought found in the discussion of the possible conventionality of simultaneity in Special Relativity, beginning with Reichenbach, and apply it to the debate over becoming. We see that it immediately renders Rietdijk and Putnam's argument unsound. I end by comparing my approach to others found in the literature, primarily Stein's.Publisher link
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-014-9237-8identifiers
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-014-9237-8ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-014-9237-8
Scopus Count
Collections